Evaluation AI Prompt: Difference between revisions

Line 5:

DA PAM 623-3 provides detailed instructions on how to write effective Senior Rater comments, emphasizing the importance of focusing on potential rather than past performance. Senior Raters are required to base their evaluations on the NCO’s contributions during the rating period and forecast their ability to excel in future assignments.

=== Guidance for Senior Rating ===

The following rules apply:

''a.'' The senior rater’s signature and date cannot be before the rater’s or intermediate rater’s signatures.

''b.'' The rated officer’s signature and date cannot be before the rater’s, the intermediate rater’s, or the senior rater’s

signatures.

'''NCOER part V:''' block c-Senior Rater-Overall performance

'''Action required:''' Senior rater evaluates overall performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate box. The senior rater’s box marks are independent of the rater’s. There is no specific box mark ratings required of the senior rater based on box marks made by the rater. The following definitions will be used when completing block c:

'''Table 3–5'''

* '''NCOER part V:''' block d-Senior Rater-Overall potential for promotion and/or service in positions of greater responsibility '''Action required:''' Senior rater evaluates overall potential by placing an “X” in the appropriate box. The senior rater’s box marks are independent of the rater’s. There is no specific box mark ratings required of the senior rater based on box marks made by the rater. The following definitions will be used when completing block d:

* Successful/Superior. A “1” rating represents the cream of the crop and is a recommendation for immediate promotion.

* A “2” rating represents a very good, strong recommendation for promotion.

* A “3” rating also represents a recommendation for promotion should sufficient allocations be available.

* Fair. A “4” rating represents NCOs who may require additional training and/or observation and should not be promoted at this time.

* Poor. A “5” rating represents NCOs who are weak or deficient and, in the opinion of the senior rater, need significant improvement or training in one or more areas. Do not promote and consider for DA imposed bar to reenlistment under the Qualitative Management Program.

* '''Reference:''' None '''NCOER part V:''' block e-Senior Rater Bullet Comments '''Action required:''' When the senior rater does not meet minimum time requirements for evaluation of the rated NCO, he or she will enter the following statement: “Senior rater does not meet minimum qualifications.” Part V, blocks c and d will not be completed, but the senior rater will sign the NCOER. Otherwise, bullet comments are mandatory. The senior rater must address any “Fair” or “Poor” ratings. If the senior rater meets the minimum time qualifications for evaluation, he or she must make bullet comments on potential and performance. The senior rater must address the lack of a rated NCO’s signature on the NCOER. Note. If the rated NCO is physically unavailable to sign (and cannot have it forwarded to him or her to sign), unable to sign, or refuses to sign the NCOER, for any reason, the senior rater will either resolve the problem or use the Wizard application associated with the electronic form within the Evaluation Entry System portal to automatically enter the appropriate statement explaining why the rated NCO’s signature is left blank in part II, block e. Otherwise, the electronic form within the Evaluation Entry System portal may not allow the NCOER to be submitted. NCOERs stating that the NCO cannot sign due to CAC issues will not be processed. The NCOER will not be delayed because it lacks the rated NCO’s signature. In those cases when the senior rater is serving as both rater and senior rater, enter a bullet comment to explain why, such as “Rater relieved” or “Serving as rater and senior rater in accordance with AR 623–3, paragraph 2–19” (or para 2–20) as appropriate. There is no requirement for the entry of this statement for GO and SES members serving in accordance with AR 623–3. Senior raters will comment on any substantiated finding, in an Army or DOD investigation or inquiry, that a rated NCO— —Committed an act of sexual harassment or sexual assault. —Failed to report a sexual harassment or assault. —Failed to respond to a complaint or report of sexual harassment or sexual assault. —Retaliated against a person making a complaint or report of sexual harassment or sexual assault. NCOs who are found with substantiated SHARP, EO, and/or EEO complaints resulting from an AR 15–6 investigation or other official investigation by military or civil authorities, the senior rater will annotate a bullet comment “does not support SHARP, EO, and EEO.”

== How To Use Template ==

@@ Line 5: / Line 5: @@
 DA PAM 623-3 provides detailed instructions on how to write effective Senior Rater comments, emphasizing the importance of focusing on potential rather than past performance. Senior Raters are required to base their evaluations on the NCO’s contributions during the rating period and forecast their ability to excel in future assignments.
+=== Guidance for Senior Rating ===
+The following rules apply:
+''a.'' The senior rater’s signature and date cannot be before the rater’s or intermediate rater’s signatures.
+''b.'' The rated officer’s signature and date cannot be before the rater’s, the intermediate rater’s, or the senior rater’s
+signatures.
+'''NCOER part V:''' block c-Senior Rater-Overall performance
+'''Action required:''' Senior rater evaluates overall performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate box. The senior rater’s box marks are independent of the rater’s. There is no specific box mark ratings required of the senior rater based on box marks made by the rater. The following definitions will be used when completing block c:
+'''Table 3–5'''
+* '''NCOER part V:''' block d-Senior Rater-Overall potential for promotion and/or service in positions of greater responsibility  '''Action required:''' Senior rater evaluates overall potential by placing an “X” in the appropriate box. The senior rater’s box marks are independent of the rater’s. There is no specific box mark ratings required of the senior rater based on box marks made by the rater. The following definitions will be used when completing block d:
+* Successful/Superior. A “1” rating represents the cream of the crop and is a recommendation for immediate promotion.
+* A “2” rating represents a very good, strong recommendation for promotion.
+* A “3” rating also represents a recommendation for promotion should sufficient allocations be available.
+* Fair. A “4” rating represents NCOs who may require additional training and/or observation and should not be promoted at this time.
+* Poor. A “5” rating represents NCOs who are weak or deficient and, in the opinion of the senior rater, need significant improvement or training in one or more areas. Do not promote and consider for DA imposed bar to reenlistment under the Qualitative Management Program.
+* '''Reference:''' None  '''NCOER part V:''' block e-Senior Rater Bullet Comments  '''Action required:''' When the senior rater does not meet minimum time requirements for evaluation of the rated NCO, he or she will enter the following statement: “Senior rater does not meet minimum qualifications.” Part V, blocks c and d will not be completed, but the senior rater will sign the NCOER. Otherwise, bullet comments are mandatory.  The senior rater must address any “Fair” or “Poor” ratings.  If the senior rater meets the minimum time qualifications for evaluation, he or she must make bullet comments on potential and performance. The senior rater must address the lack of a rated NCO’s signature on the NCOER.  Note. If the rated NCO is physically unavailable to sign (and cannot have it forwarded to him or her to sign), unable to sign, or refuses to sign the NCOER, for any reason, the senior rater will either resolve the problem or use the Wizard application associated with the electronic form within the Evaluation Entry System portal to automatically enter the appropriate statement explaining why the rated NCO’s signature is left blank in part II, block e. Otherwise, the electronic form within the Evaluation Entry System portal may not allow the NCOER to be submitted. NCOERs stating that the NCO cannot sign due to CAC issues will not be processed. The NCOER will not be delayed because it lacks the rated NCO’s signature.  In those cases when the senior rater is serving as both rater and senior rater, enter a bullet comment to explain why, such as “Rater relieved” or “Serving as rater and senior rater in accordance with AR 623–3, paragraph 2–19” (or para 2–20) as appropriate. There is no requirement for the entry of this statement for GO and SES members serving in accordance with AR 623–3.  Senior raters will comment on any substantiated finding, in an Army or DOD investigation or inquiry, that a rated NCO—  —Committed an act of sexual harassment or sexual assault.  —Failed to report a sexual harassment or assault.  —Failed to respond to a complaint or report of sexual harassment or sexual assault.  —Retaliated against a person making a complaint or report of sexual harassment or sexual assault.  NCOs who are found with substantiated SHARP, EO, and/or EEO complaints resulting from an AR 15–6 investigation or other official investigation by military or civil authorities, the senior rater will annotate a bullet comment “does not support SHARP, EO, and EEO.”
 == How To Use Template ==