VPN Recommendation: Difference between revisions
Tag: 2017 source edit |
→Privacy Policy Comparison: vpn chart Tag: 2017 source edit |
||
Line 114: | Line 114: | ||
As of 2023-03-19: | As of 2023-03-19: | ||
See a much more robust and updated [https://www.techlore.tech/vpn vpn comparison chart here] | |||
{| class="wikitable sortable" | {| class="wikitable sortable" |
Revision as of 15:38, 22 November 2024
What is a VPN
A VPN (Virtual Private Network) is a tool that creates a private network connection across a public network, such as the Internet. It provides privacy (obfuscation) and security (encryption) while on the public network but does not guarantee anonymity. To achieve anonymity, The Onion Routing (TOR) is required.
Beyond traditional VPNs, there are alternative tools like Cloudflare Tunnels, ZeroTier, Tailscale, and proprietary solutions like Apple Private Relay and Cloudflare WARP. These tools offer unique features and integrations that can complement or replace VPNs depending on the use case.
VPNs and Alternatives
Tool | Features | Use Cases | Notable Integrations |
---|---|---|---|
Mullvad VPN | Privacy-focused, no email association, cash payment support. | Obfuscation, secure browsing. | Integrates with Tailscale for private routing.[1] |
IVPN | Privacy-first, anonymous signups, supports cash payments. | Secure browsing, privacy-focused users. | Supports multi-hop and WireGuard configurations. |
ProtonVPN | Swiss-based, strong privacy laws, free tier available. | Secure browsing, privacy-conscious users. | Integrates with ProtonMail for encrypted email. |
Cloudflare Tunnels | Exposes local services securely via Cloudflare's network. | Hosting services without public IP, bypassing firewalls. | Works with Cloudflare Access for zero-trust security. |
ZeroTier | Peer-to-peer virtual network with mesh routing. | IoT devices, gaming, remote access. | Supports IPv4/IPv6 networks and integrates with network controllers. |
Tailscale | Simplifies VPN configuration using WireGuard. | Secure remote access to private resources. | Mullvad VPN integration provides enhanced privacy by routing via Mullvad servers.[1] |
TOR | Provides anonymity using layered encryption. | Accessing the dark web, bypassing censorship. | Integrates with browsers like Tor Browser. |
Cloudflare WARP | Encrypts all DNS queries and some traffic, improving security. | Lightweight, better for speed and low-latency connections. | Cannot route all traffic like traditional VPNs. |
Apple Private Relay | Masks user IP and DNS requests when using Safari. | Privacy-focused for general browsing. | Limited to Apple ecosystem and Safari browser. |
Benefits of Alternatives
- Cloudflare Tunnels: Removes the need for exposing your IP by using a reverse proxy over HTTPS.
- ZeroTier: Provides mesh networking, ideal for personal and small business use cases.
- Tailscale: Combines WireGuard's security with ease of use, and with Mullvad integration, ensures privacy by routing traffic through Mullvad's VPN servers.[1]
- Cloudflare WARP: Lightweight and designed for DNS and basic traffic encryption; better for speed than traditional VPNs.
- Apple Private Relay: Protects Safari users' IP addresses and DNS queries but does not act as a complete VPN.
VPN vs WireGuard, Tailscale, and ZeroTier
Feature | Traditional VPN | WireGuard | Tailscale | ZeroTier |
---|---|---|---|---|
Setup Complexity | Moderate to high; may require manual configuration. | Easy to moderate; simple setup for many clients. | Easy; uses your identity provider for access control. | Moderate; requires understanding of network rules. |
Performance | Lower due to older protocols. | High; lightweight and efficient. | High; uses WireGuard under the hood. | High; optimized for P2P routing. |
Privacy | Good; depends on provider policies. | Depends on implementation (e.g., Mullvad uses WireGuard). | Good; Mullvad integration enhances privacy.[1] | Decentralized, privacy depends on configuration. |
Flexibility | Routes all internet traffic. | Routes specific traffic as configured. | Simplifies remote access to private resources. | Allows custom virtual networks. |
Use Case | General-purpose secure browsing. | Optimized for speed and secure connections. | Simplifies secure remote access and sharing. | Custom networks for IoT, gaming, or remote access. |
Privacy Policy Comparison
As of 2023-03-19:
See a much more robust and updated vpn comparison chart here
Provider | Personal Data | Data Retention | Third-Parties | Payment Options | Country of Data Storage | Individual Rights | Policy Updates | $/Device/Month |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mullvad VPN | Payment info, support/problem report info. | 40 days - statutory period, six months for support. | E-mail service providers, payment suppliers. | Cash, Cryptocurrency, Credit/Debit Card | EU/EEA | Correction, deletion, limitation, complaint. | Published on the website. | $1 |
IVPN | Account, payment, usage, crash logs, device permissions. | 90 days (mostly); accounting unlinked; logs as needed. | Braintree, PayPal. | Cash, Cryptocurrency, Credit/Debit Card | EU (GDPR Compliant) | Access, rectification, erasure, revoke permissions. | Posted on the website, emailed to customers. | $1.42 |
Proton VPN | Account creation, support/bug reports. | Retained for active accounts; deleted when closed. | Referrer platforms, routing technology. | Cash, Cryptocurrency, Credit/Debit Card | Switzerland | Access, edit, delete, export, complaint. | Notification of changes for enabled users. | $1 |
Nord Security | User-provided data, automatic data, third-party data. | Varies by data type. | Payment processors, support, analytics, marketing. | Credit/Debit Card, PayPal, Cryptocurrency | Panama | Access, rectification, erasure, etc. | Updates communicated on the website. | $2.4 |
VPN Troubles
Signs of a Bad VPN Provider
- They offer a free trial but require payment information.
- They are a Free VPN.
- History of selling user data.
- Search terms like "no logs" or "zero logs" in terms of service or privacy policies.
- Research the VPN provider's reputation (e.g., "provider name scam OR fraud OR ripoff").
VPN Provider Risks
Some VPN providers, particularly those owned by KAPE Technologies, may pose risks to user privacy. KAPE Technologies owns:
- CyberGhost VPN
- Zenmate VPN
- Private Internet Access (PIA)
- ExpressVPN
- SurfShark
KAPE's history and acquisitions raise privacy concerns. For instance:
- CyberGhost VPN was purchased by KAPE for $10 million in 2017.[2]
- Private Internet Access was bought for $127 million in 2019.[3]
- ExpressVPN was acquired for $936 million in 2021.[4]
Kape VPN relationships Users should carefully evaluate VPN providers' transparency and privacy policies before choosing a service.