Center of Gravity Analysis Guide

Center of Gravity (COG) Analysis Guide

Return to the main research section.

Overview

The Center of Gravity (COG) is a pivotal concept in military theory and strategic planning. It identifies the primary source of moral or physical strength, freedom of action, or will to act. Proper identification and manipulation of the COG can lead to significant strategic advantages.

References

• Vulnerability Assessment Method Pocket Guide: A Tool for Center of Gravity Analysis
• Community Planning Guide - search for “OIE COG Guide”
• The Role of Information in Conflict
• Understanding Military Technology
• Economic Strength as a Pillar of National Security
• Cyber Warfare

Objectives and Detailed Questions

Identify the COG

Friendly COG: Assess our foundational strengths across various spectrums:

• Diplomatic: What international alliances and diplomatic relations fortify our position?
• 🛰️ Information: Which communication and propaganda efforts are most influential?
• 🔫 Military: What units or systems are crucial for our success?
• 💰 Economic: What economic policies and resources ensure our sustained operations?
• 💻 Cyber: What are our capabilities for defending and attacking in the digital realm?
• 🌌 Space: How do our satellite and extraterrestrial operations enhance our strategic goals?

Adversary COG: Pinpoint the adversary’s vital sources of power and potential targets:

• Diplomatic: How do their international relationships affect their strategic capabilities?
• 🛰️ Information: What misinformation or psychological operations do they deploy?
• 🔫 Military: Which military assets are essential to their operational success?
• 💰 Economic: Which economic dependencies are exploitable?
• 💻 Cyber: What are their cyber vulnerabilities?
• 🌌 Space: Do they rely heavily on space-based assets?

Host Nation COG: Assess the host nation’s pivotal strengths and vulnerabilities:

• Diplomatic: What is the host nation’s stance, and how does it influence the conflict?
• 🛰️ Information: What are their capabilities in managing or disseminating information?
• 🔫 Military: What military aspects of the Host Nation could influence their role in the conflict?
• 💰 Economic: How do the economic conditions affect their alignment in the conflict?
• 💻 Cyber: Assess the cyber infrastructure and defenses of the host nation.
• 🌌 Space: Evaluate the host nation’s reliance and capabilities on space-based assets.

Steps in COG Analysis

1. Define the Operational Environment See PMESII-PT:

1. What are the geographic, political, and societal characteristics that affect potential COGs?
2. How do these elements advantage or disadvantage various actors?

2. Determine COGs for All Parties See Identify Section:

1. Assess strengths and resources to hypothesize potential COGs for friendly, adversary, and host nation forces.
2. What roles do these COGs play in their respective organizations’ strategies?

3. Identifying Critical Capabilities

• Function and Influence (Verbs): Identify the key actions a COG can perform to exert its power and control. Look for verbs that describe what the COG does to achieve its goals.
• Strategic Contribution (Outcomes - Nouns or Adjectives): These capabilities contribute to the organization’s success by enabling specific achievements. Look for nouns that describe the desired outcomes or adjectives that depict the positive impact on strategic objectives.
• Impact of Loss (Verbs): Imagine the COG’s critical capability being removed or weakened. How would this hinder its ability to function? Verbs come back into play here, but this time, they focus on the negative consequences.

Examples of Critical Capabilities in Different Contexts (Nouns & Verbs):

• Diplomatic (Mostly Nouns):

 * Negotiation power (Noun): The ability to secure favorable outcomes in negotiations. (Verb: Negotiate effectively)
 * Treaty alliances (Noun): A network of formal agreements with other nations. (Verb: Leverage alliances for support)
 * International law expertise (Noun): The ability to navigate complex legal frameworks. (Verb: Utilize legal expertise to advance interests)

• Informational (Mix of Nouns & Verbs):

 * Propaganda dissemination (Noun): Shaping public opinion through controlled messaging. (Verb: Disseminate propaganda)
 * Intelligence gathering (Noun): Collecting and analyzing information. (Verb: Gather and analyze intelligence)
 * Media control (Noun): Influencing or controlling the flow of information. (Verb: Control or influence media)

• Military (Mostly Nouns):

 * Key combat units (Noun): Elite or specialized military forces. (Verb: Deploy key combat units)
 * Advanced weaponry systems (Noun): Possessing superior technology. (Verb: Utilize advanced weaponry)
 * Logistical networks (Noun): The ability to efficiently move resources. (Verb: Maintain efficient logistical networks)

• Economic (Mix of Nouns & Verbs):

 * Control over critical resources (Noun): Access to vital resources. (Verb: Control or leverage critical resources)
 * Financial systems (Noun): A robust and stable financial system. (Verb: Maintain a stable financial system)
 * Major export capabilities (Noun): The ability to produce and sell goods and services. (Verb: Export goods and services)

Tips:

• When identifying critical capabilities, focus on actions (verbs) that directly translate the COG’s strength into influence.
• Look for outcomes (nouns) or positive impacts (adjectives) to understand how these capabilities contribute to strategic success.
• Use verbs again to describe the negative consequences of losing or weakening a critical capability.

By understanding the types of words associated with critical capabilities, you can better understand how a COG functions and the potential impact of disrupting its strengths.

4. Determine Critical Requirements

Focus: Resources (Nouns)

Critical requirements are the essential elements needed to sustain the identified critical capabilities. Here, we focus on nouns representing the resources that keep the capabilities functioning. Consider these categories:

• Logistical: Physical resources for operations, such as weapons, equipment, fuel, food, and transportation.
• Technological: Infrastructure, systems, and expertise to maintain technological advantages.
• Human: Trained personnel with the skills and knowledge to execute the critical capabilities.
• Financial: Budgetary resources to acquire, maintain, and operate the necessary elements.

Analysis:

• Current Fulfillment (Verbs): Describe how these requirements are currently being met. Use verbs to explain the processes involved (e.g., “procured,” “developed,” “trained,” “funded”).
• Risks and Threats (Nouns & Verbs): Identify potential disruptions to these resources. Look for nouns that represent threats (e.g., “supply chain disruptions,” “cyberattacks”) and verbs that describe potential consequences (e.g., “hinder access,” “disrupt operations”).

Targeting Weaknesses:

• External Dependencies (Nouns): Are there external sources relied upon for critical resources? These can be vulnerabilities (nouns) that adversaries could exploit (e.g., reliance on foreign oil and dependence on specific software vendors).
• Internal Weaknesses (Nouns): Look for inefficiencies or shortcomings within the organization that could be targeted (e.g., outdated equipment, inadequately trained personnel, vulnerabilities in financial systems).

Remember: By identifying critical requirements, you understand what’s necessary to keep the COG functioning. Analyzing how these needs are met and potential disruptions helps pinpoint weaknesses that could be exploited.

5. Identify Critical Vulnerabilities (Nouns)

Focus: Weaknesses (Nouns)

Critical vulnerabilities are the weak spots within the structures that support critical capabilities. Here, nouns are key to identifying potential points of failure. Look for:

• Single Points of Failure (Nouns): Critical dependencies on a single resource, system, or location. These become prime targets for disruption (e.g., a single bridge for transporting supplies or a key power grid node).
• Overreliance (Nouns): Excessive dependence on specific resources or technologies that could become unavailable or ineffective (e.g., reliance on a single supplier for vital materials, dependence on outdated communication systems).
• Exposed Logistical Lines (Nouns): Vulnerable transportation routes, communication networks, or storage facilities that could be easily disrupted (e.g., long and unprotected supply lines, unsecured data servers). Understanding these vulnerabilities allows strategists to prioritize defense and mitigation strategies effectively.

Understanding Logarithmic Weighting

Logarithmic weighting enhances the perceptual differences between various levels of severity in critical vulnerabilities. This approach uses a logarithmic scale to assign weightings, where minor differences at the lower end of the scale are less significant and differences at the higher end are more pronounced. This helps decision-makers intuitively grasp which vulnerabilities are the most severe and thus require the most attention and resources.

Weights should consider: 1, 3, 5, 8, 12

Impact on the COG (I)

1. Definition: Evaluates the extent to which a vulnerability affects the COG’s essential functionality or stability. This includes considering both the immediate impact and the potential for escalated disruptions or impairments over time.
2. Application: Analysis should include a detailed examination of how the vulnerability might compromise the COG, considering scenarios of varying severity and their probable impacts on the COG’s operations and objectives.

Attainability (A)

1. Definition: Assesses the feasibility of exploiting or mitigating the vulnerability, given the available resources, capabilities, and situational constraints.
2. Application: This involves an evaluation of the logistical, technological, and temporal resources required to address the vulnerability effectively. It should consider both the resources currently available and those that can be realistically obtained or mobilized.

Potential for Follow-Up Actions (F)

1. Definition: Measures the extent to which addressing the vulnerability can provide strategic advantages or enable further actions that strengthen the COG or degrade an adversary’s position.
2. Application: Focus on identifying opportunities for additional strategic actions post-mitigation or exploitation. This could include enhanced security measures, increased political leverage, or any actions that could weaken the opposition further.

Application of Logarithmic Weighting in Assessing Vulnerabilities

Weights should consider a logarithmic scale: 1, 3, 5, 8, 12. This approach highlights the non-linear impact of each score, where differences at the higher end of the scale are significantly more impactful than at the lower end.

Example Table: Assessment of Atropia’s Critical Vulnerabilities Using Logarithmic Weighting

Vulnerability	Impact on COG (I)	Attainability (A)	Follow-Up (F)	Weighted Score
Single Point of Failure	12	8	5	25
Overreliance on Single Supplier	5	8	8	21
Exposed Communication Network	8	12	12	32

Interpreting Scores:

• Scores are calculated by summing the weighted values assigned based on the severity of each criterion.
• A higher weighted score indicates a higher priority for mitigation or attacking efforts. Vulnerabilities with scores closer to the maximum possible value (40 in this case, given the highest weights possible, are 12, 12, 8, 8, 1) indicate critical areas that require immediate attention to safeguard or attack the COG.

Tools and Techniques

• SWOT Analysis: Evaluate the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats of each COG.
• PMESII-PT Analysis: Use this framework to analyze the broad operational environment’s political, military, economic, social, informational, infrastructure, physical terrain, and temporal factors.

Best Practices

• Regular Updates: Continuously adapt the COG analysis as the operational environment evolves.
• Collaborative Efforts: Engage experts from various fields to ensure a comprehensive and nuanced analysis.
• Technology Utilization: Employ advanced analytical tools and simulations to enhance predictive capabilities and scenario planning.