Center of Gravity Analysis Guide: Difference between revisions
formatting and removed the cog diagram that didn't render |
→Potential for Follow-Up Actions (F): table update |
||
Line 149: | Line 149: | ||
Weights should consider a logarithmic scale: 1, 3, 5, 8, 12. This approach highlights the non-linear impact of each score, where differences at the higher end of the scale are significantly more impactful than at the lower end. | Weights should consider a logarithmic scale: 1, 3, 5, 8, 12. This approach highlights the non-linear impact of each score, where differences at the higher end of the scale are significantly more impactful than at the lower end. | ||
{| class="wikitable sortable" | |||
|+Assessment Criteria and Evaluation | |||
{| class="wikitable" | |||
|- | |- | ||
! Vulnerability | ! Vulnerability | ||
Line 158: | Line 157: | ||
! Follow-Up (F) | ! Follow-Up (F) | ||
! Weighted Score | ! Weighted Score | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Single Point of Failure | | Single Point of Failure | ||
Line 165: | Line 163: | ||
| 5 | | 5 | ||
| '''25''' | | '''25''' | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Overreliance on Single Supplier | | Overreliance on Single Supplier | ||
Line 172: | Line 169: | ||
| 8 | | 8 | ||
| '''21''' | | '''21''' | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Exposed Communication Network | | Exposed Communication Network | ||
Line 179: | Line 175: | ||
| 12 | | 12 | ||
| '''32''' | | '''32''' | ||
|} | |} | ||
'''''Example Table: Assessment of Atropia’s Critical Vulnerabilities Using Logarithmic Weighting''''' | |||
'''Defining the Criteria (IAF):''' | |||
'''Interpreting Scores:''' | '''Interpreting Scores:''' |