Center of Gravity Analysis Guide: Difference between revisions

formatting and removed the cog diagram that didn't render
Line 149: Line 149:
Weights should consider a logarithmic scale: 1, 3, 5, 8, 12. This approach highlights the non-linear impact of each score, where differences at the higher end of the scale are significantly more impactful than at the lower end.
Weights should consider a logarithmic scale: 1, 3, 5, 8, 12. This approach highlights the non-linear impact of each score, where differences at the higher end of the scale are significantly more impactful than at the lower end.


'''Example Table: Assessment of Atropia’s Critical Vulnerabilities Using Logarithmic Weighting'''
{| class="wikitable sortable"
 
|+Assessment Criteria and Evaluation
{| class="wikitable"
|-
|-
! Vulnerability
! Vulnerability
Line 158: Line 157:
! Follow-Up (F)
! Follow-Up (F)
! Weighted Score
! Weighted Score
|
|-
|-
| Single Point of Failure
| Single Point of Failure
Line 165: Line 163:
| 5
| 5
| '''25'''
| '''25'''
|
|-
|-
| Overreliance on Single Supplier
| Overreliance on Single Supplier
Line 172: Line 169:
| 8
| 8
| '''21'''
| '''21'''
|
|-
|-
| Exposed Communication Network
| Exposed Communication Network
Line 179: Line 175:
| 12
| 12
| '''32'''
| '''32'''
|
|}
|}
'''''Example Table: Assessment of Atropia’s Critical Vulnerabilities Using Logarithmic Weighting'''''
'''Defining the Criteria (IAF):'''


'''Interpreting Scores:'''
'''Interpreting Scores:'''