Center of Gravity Analysis Guide: Difference between revisions
→Friendly COG:: expanded friendlgy cog why |
|||
Line 130: | Line 130: | ||
Two primary approaches to scoring are '''Traditional Scoring''' and '''Logarithmic Scoring'''. Each method has its strengths and should be selected based on the analysis's complexity and depth. | Two primary approaches to scoring are '''Traditional Scoring''' and '''Logarithmic Scoring'''. Each method has its strengths and should be selected based on the analysis's complexity and depth. | ||
===== Traditional Scoring ===== | |||
Traditional scoring is a linear method where each criterion is rated on a simple scale, often between 1 and 5. This system is straightforward and effective for scenarios where planners need a basic method to compare and prioritize factors. | Traditional scoring is a linear method where each criterion is rated on a simple scale, often between 1 and 5. This system is straightforward and effective for scenarios where planners need a basic method to compare and prioritize factors. | ||
Line 147: | Line 147: | ||
* May lack nuance for complex, multidimensional problems. | * May lack nuance for complex, multidimensional problems. | ||
===== Logarithmic Scoring ===== | |||
Logarithmic scoring is a more nuanced system that allows for greater differentiation between scores, especially at the higher end of the scale. This method is particularly useful when certain factors exponentially impact outcomes. For example, a small increase in a critical capability may drastically affect the overall mission, and logarithmic scoring captures that non-linear impact. | Logarithmic scoring is a more nuanced system that allows for greater differentiation between scores, especially at the higher end of the scale. This method is particularly useful when certain factors exponentially impact outcomes. For example, a small increase in a critical capability may drastically affect the overall mission, and logarithmic scoring captures that non-linear impact. | ||
Line 178: | Line 178: | ||
# '''Adaptability''': Be prepared to adjust the scoring system based on the specific requirements of the operation or mission. | # '''Adaptability''': Be prepared to adjust the scoring system based on the specific requirements of the operation or mission. | ||
# '''Training''': Provide sufficient training to ensure that all analysts and planners understand how to apply the scoring system correctly. | # '''Training''': Provide sufficient training to ensure that all analysts and planners understand how to apply the scoring system correctly. | ||
=== Composite Score Calculation === | === Composite Score Calculation === |